<AWARDS>
VENICE FILM FESTIVAL 2004, Luigi De Laurentiis Award
Opening Film of Jakarta International Film Festival 2005
In
French & Arabic with English Subtitles
Genre: Road movie
Director: Ismaël Ferroukhi
Starring: Nicolas Cazale, Mohamed Majd
Released By: Cathay-Keris Films & Festive
Films
Rating: PG
Official Website: http://www.festivefilms.com/legrandvoyage
Opening Day: 12 January 2006
Synopsis:
A few weeks before his college entrance exams, Reda, a young
man who lives in the south of France, finds himself forced
to drive his father to Mecca. From the start, the journey
looks to be difficult. Reda and his father have nothing in
common. Talk is reduced to the strict minimum. Reda wants
to experience this trip in his own way. His father demands
respect for himself and the meaning of this pilgrimage. As
they drive through different countries and meet various people,
Reda and his father observe each other warily. How can they
create a relationship when communication is impossible? From
the south of France, through Italy, Serbia, Turkey, Syria,
Jordan to Saudi Arabia, their road is 3,000 miles long.
Movie Review:
The study of proxemics (various aspects of spatial distances
between individuals) has long been overlooked by individuals
globally, leading to numerous faux pas at social occasions,
breakdowns in communications and failure to build rapport.
It’s regrettable that spatial consideration is not a
primary thematic concern for most books and films, and it’s
always a refreshing break when a nice film like “Le
Grand Voyage” chooses to address this phenomenon. Considering
that the field of proxemics is all-encompassing in terms of
relationships, director Ismael Ferroukhi has made a strategic
decision to narrow the focus down to a single relationship
that often proves to be the Achilles’ heel of family
social dynamics: that of a father and son.
With
the setting of a Muslim family residing in France, this film
has paved a powerful scenario for strong, progressive development
in the story. Cultural identity and cross-cultural integration
stays strong in this film. The former becomes prominent when
the family strives to maintain their religious practices in
the midst of a foreign land. Cross-cultural integration is
depicted through the fact that the family speaks French while
practising Islam. The fact that the lead protagonist Reda
(Nicolas Cazale) is also dating a foreigner also exemplifies
this. The director has tactfully illustrated this tension
by focusing on the conflict between the religiously-devoted
father and the somewhat agnostic son.
This
film is about a father Mohamed Majd who wishes to embark on
a Haj to Mecca. However, as a man of faith, he decides to
travel by car rather than by plane. Being someone who is unable
to drive, he has requested for his son Reda to drive him there.
Having exams to pass, a girlfriend whom he cannot get his
mind off and a 3000-mile journey ride, Reda is full of reluctance
to make the trip. Nevertheless, it’s his friction with
his father that proves to be the primary resistance. Both
father and son view each other indignantly with their differences
in opinions. While the father sees the son as unreligious
and rebellious, the son eyes his father with contempt, viewing
him as a man who is obstinate and conventional.
The
strength of this film lies in its intricate details, namely
the interactions between the father and son. However, it’s
the non-verbal communications that stands out in this film.
From the scene where both of them got lost midway during the
journey to the fright of the son when he discovered that his
father has a fever, the film never lets down on its portrayal
of kinship. It’s the family bonds that ultimately bind
the family members together and throughout the journey, this
idealism is continually being reinforced by the film. And
as they got closer to Mecca, the bond grows stronger. And
towards the end, the audience will get a glimpse of what fatherhood
is all about.
This
theme of the film bears a close resemblance to “The
Pilgrimage”, a novel by acclaimed author Paul Coelho,
whereby the main protagonist (the author himself) makes a
pilgrimage. Along the same vein as the film, the author faces
his trials and tribulations, thus making the entire journey
meaningful. One similarity will be the encounter with a villain.
Both the film and the novel delve into the importance of looking
beyond someone’s intent. While on the surface the intent
may be genuine, deceit and fraud may be seething beneath.
The danger of being blinded by a façade has always
been prevalent in modern societies and this film serves as
a medium that reinforces this. It’s meaningful social
messages such as this that makes this film such a delight
to watch.
However, this film falls short in several areas though. For
starters, while the journey requires the father and son to
travel from Europe to the Middle East, almost all the scenes
are shot in the Middle East sans the scenes in Europe. While
some audiences may find this to be relevant to the film’s
religious themes, others may find themselves to be shortchanged
in terms of the logical, linear narratives in the story. Also,
the bonding of the father-son relationship, while progressive,
is not entirely convincing. The raw emotion is only depicted
as the film nears the end. This causes the film to lose much
of its emotional impact, with some audiences finding the transformation
in emotion to be a tad too late.
Nevertheless,
this film really scores in getting a message across to the
audience: that regardless of conflicts in beliefs, age or
interest, emotional bonding is always possible if frequent
contacts can be made and an awareness of proxemics be made
known. Be it circumstantial or by choice.
Movie
Rating:
Review
by Patrick Tay
(“Le
Grand Voyage”, while filled with religious overtones,
is in actuality a simple albeit beautiful tale of emotional
bonding between father and son.)
|